Special town meeting for “Two Brooks Preserve”

PLYMPTON – On Monday, Aug. 6, Plympton Selectmen met at Town House and executed a lengthy agenda. The town clerk updated the board on ongoing projects and appointments, several appointments were made to the fire department, the board interviewed two candidates for Zoning Enforcement Officer and hired one, set up a gift fund for the Atwood property– now known as, “Two Brooks Preserve,”– and a Special Town Meeting to address the preserve was finalized after the meeting.

Town Clerk Update

Tara Shaw, the town clerk, updated the board on several ongoing projects. First, she updated the board on General Code, the company that is codifying the Plympton bylaws. They are checking for everything from spelling errors to conflicts with Massachusetts law. All deadlines are being met.

She also noted that five bylaws changed at the annual town meeting were submitted to the Attorney General’s office in the proper time frame, and that the deadline for the Attorney General’s office to get back to Plympton with approvals that the bylaws don’t conflict with Massachusetts law (or seeking further information from the town) is Sept. 3.

Adjustments to 2018 appointments to boards and committees were made on the recommendation of Shaw. The board had voted on all 48 appointments at once at a previous meeting, but according to Shaw, not everyone accepted their appointments, or their appointment terms.

Notably, Bob Karling did not accept his appointment as the Zoning Enforcement Officer and Fence Viewer, and Carol Quindley did not accept her appointment to the Historic District Commission.

Harry Weikel, originally an alternate to the Zoning Board of Appeals, only accepted full membership to that board with the term coinciding with that of his alternate term date, ending June 30, 2019.

Several Committees were dissolved, including the Fire Executive Oversight Committee, the Fire Technical Committee, the Memorial Day Committee, the DOR Advisory Board and the Plympton Housing Production Committee.

Wendy Jones was appointed Assistant Assessor.

Shaw is also looking for an intern or a volunteer to help maintain the town’s website.

“You’ve planted a seed, let’s see if it grows,” said Selectmen Chairman John Traynor, who supported the idea.

New Zoning
Enforcement Officer

Selectmen interviewed Jack O’Leary, of Plympton, and Allan Fraser, of Franklin, for the position of Zoning Enforcement Officer. The current ZEO, Tom Millias, is the building inspector and is acting on an interim basis.

O’Leary said that he sought the position, “Mainly because I’ve been involved in this in my day job and volunteering in the town for a while.”

But, O’Leary has a full-time job as an engineer, and the board, especially Traynor was concerned about the time commitment needed for the position.

Allan Fraser, of Franklin, was ultimately unanimously hired by the board.

Fraser, who says he has, “a tremendous amount of experience,” citing jobs as building inspector in Newton and councilor in Lowell as examples, has never lived in a community he has worked in, he says.

Selectman Russo stated that he wanted a balance in zoning enforcement.

Fraser said that he preferred the term “administration” to “enforcement,” and that he believed that the key to effective zoning regulation is education. He mentioned using technology for that education and to remind residents and businesses of their obligations under the zoning laws.

Fire Department new hires

The Plympton Fire Department family showed up to the meeting to celebrate the appointment of five new members to the force. All members of the PFD, including the new members, have successfully passed CORI and SORI checks, something that had not been done under the tenure of Fire Chief Warren Borsari, leading to the separation of several employees from the force.

Nathan Currier, Edward Coughlin, Carl Johnson, Richard Cosato and Jennifer Fulton were all appointed. Although only two were present, a sizable crowd of firefighters, paramedics, EMTs and their family members and friends joined the meeting for a brief photo.

The board seems to take particular delight in the “reinvigorated” fire department, under the leadership of Captains Cheryl Davis and John Sjostedt and Fire Consultant Lance Benjamino, Chief of the Middleboro Fire Department.

Town Administrator Elizabeth Dennehy announced that 17 applicants have applied to date for the position of permanent fire chief, noting that the town is still early in the hiring process.

“Two Brooks Preserve”

The Atwood property, on Prospect Road, now known as the “Two Brooks Preserve,” is rapidly in the process of being purchased by the town. The land, which was held in Chapter 61A, was changing from agricultural use to another use when it was put on the market, and the town exercised its right of first refusal to purchase the property.

The sellers wish to move the sale along, and the board acquiesced to two conditions put on the sale, the first being 24-hours’ notice for access to the property, and the second being that the seller did not want to put a 30-day extension on the execution of the purchase and sales agreement.

Selectman Mark Russo explained that the board would like to set up both a “gift-fund” for the preserve, as well as issue bonds to fund the multisource funded project. The bonds will take some time to set up.

The fund was approved by the board, and Russo said that he hoped that individuals would give generously. Donations are tax-deductible and will be returned if voters do not approve the purchase at the fall STM. If enough money is raised through alternate means, he said, less Community Preservation money could be used for the project, or fewer lots may need to be sold to raise money for the purchase.

“We’re looking for people and hoping for people to be really generous,” he said, noting that donations for land last forever.

Regarding the tight timeline for the Two Brooks Preserve, Traynor said that there was, “a very tight schedule.” and Russo said that, “One wrong step and we could mess everything up. We don’t want any wrong steps.”

Special Town Meeting

Town officials announced Wednesday that a Special Town Meeting asking voters to approve the purchase of the Two Brooks Preserve will be held on Sept. 20. The time and place will be announced soon by the Selectmen’s office.

The Plympton Board of Selectmen will next meet Aug. 20 at 6 p.m.

Proponents promise to make a federal case of it

PLYMPTON – On Tuesday, Aug. 31, the Plympton Zoning Board of Appeals voted down the variances necessary for an application by Industrial Tower and Wireless, LLC., of Marshfield, to build a 120-foot, lattice-style cell phone tower at the corner of Center Street and Palmer Road, on a business-zoned lot by a 2-1 vote.

Board members Dave Alberti and Harry Weikel voted against issuing the variances for the proposed cell tower, despite the previous warnings of town counsel Robin Stein that they are opening Plympton up to a federal lawsuit by violating the Federal Telecommunications Act of 1996.

Board Chairman Ken Thompson voted for the project, noting afterward that his vote didn’t matter because any variances that ITW sought needed to be decided on unanimously by the board.

The meeting did not have the intensity or drama of previous meetings on the subject, as the board had already indicated which way they were leaning, although the townspeople at the hearing were visibly pleased with the ultimate result.

The hearing was brief– less than 30 minutes. The lawyer for ITW, Jeffrey Angely was still slick and could be heard chuckling from time to time in the audience; the Town’s lawyer appeared to be much more prepared than at last week’s hearing, where she acted confused as the board increasingly moved in the direction of a denial.

The public was not permitted to speak because the testimony portion of the hearing had ended, despite their being a full house.

Thompson began the hearing by warning that it was the board’s turn to continue deliberations at this meeting. Stein read the history of the hearing into the record, notably a number of continuances beginning May 24.

Stein again walked the board through their previous findings, which they hadn’t yet voted on.

She reiterated the law, noting that federal law requires local zoning ordinances to be waived should the ZBA find that there is both a significant gap in coverage and that there were no alternate sites for a tower per the TCA of 1996. Stein noted that this sort of case has been well litigated in the federal courts, both in our circuit and others.

The public had previously noted numerous other locations for a tower, most notably the First Church steeple, which Church officials claim had not been properly investigated. ITW has made claims that 7,000 to 8,000 vehicles a day pass through this alleged coverage gap. This has not been independently verified, according to officials.

Weikel next read a lengthy statement into the record as part of his deliberation, noting what he counted as 17 “significant” variances, not just the four in the application, that he believed the applicant required for the construction of a cell-tower. He noted other possible locations he found suitable, including a town-owned parcel behind the Town House.

Alberti attempted to read a letter, a source says from a previous zoning official or board member, into the record but was quickly stopped by Stein on the grounds that it was testimony, not part of the deliberations.

At that point, the Board was ready to vote as their deliberations were complete.

Stein read an affirmative motion to approve the variances, with several conditions, into the record, to which Thompson said, “So moved.” Alberti seconded the motion.

Weikel voted first, against the motion, and then Alberti voted against the motion as well.

Thompson voted last, somewhat half-heartedly, in favor of the motion.

The motion failed as the vote was not unanimous.

At that point, Stein directed the board to vote on a motion for the reasons for the denial, as federal law requires that any denial be based on “substantial evidence in the record.”

She began by reading item by item from a list she had prepared, for example, “That the proposed telecommunications tower is in the business district,” which quickly became too cumbersome because of the number of items on her list.

She and the board together decided to read the whole list of more than a dozen reasons to deny the application at once, and the board voted unanimously to approve that list. The findings will be published on or around Aug. 8, according to Stein and Thompson.

What will happen after that is not clear.

The board appears to be bracing themselves for a lawsuit. Town officials were not available for immediate comment as of press time, and a source who did not wish to be named suggested that there would be no comment from the Town.

When Stein told opposing attorney Angley that the board would meet Wednesday, Aug. 8, at 5 p.m. for an administrative meeting, he replied, “We have no reason to be there.”

When she told him that the findings would be published at or shortly after that meeting, he asked for a courtesy copy, grabbed his suit coat, said, “Whatever,” and stormed out of the room with a flourish. He could be seen talking animatedly with ITW representatives in the parking lot after the hearing.

PLYMPTON – The heat rose in the Large Meeting Room of Town House Tuesday, July 24, both literally and figuratively as townspeople squared off against telecommunications tower applicant Industrial Tower and Wireless, LLC. Jeffrey Angley, attorney representing the applicant, was slick. The town’s attorney, Robin Stein, mumbled and was hard to understand. And several neighbors and citizens of the proposed 120-foot lattice structure seemed incensed with the ZBA’s apparent acquiescence to the applicant.

Then, a surprise turn of events changed everything.

The hearing started out as most formal hearings do. A prepared statement was read into the minutes by the chair. The applicant was asked if they had any new updates for the board, since this was the third meeting of the continued hearing on the subject. They did not. They summarized their plans to build a 120-foot lattice telecommunications tower at the corner of Center Street and Palmer Road, on a four-acre lot that is “Business” zoned but is abutted by “Residential/Agricultural” zoning. ITW is proposing an 80-foot by 80-foot perimeter fence around the tower, with a 20-foot wide access road.

The applicant admitted that the tower will be visible from many locations in town, noting only that, “there is no perfect location [for a tower].”

The company is seeking zoning relief under the federal 1996 Telecommunications Act, that, according to the town’s attorney, was created to help build telecommunications infrastructure because most cell towers do not conform to local zoning bylaws, nationally.

Angley and Stein, opposing attorneys, appeared to agree that if the applicant can demonstrate that there is a significant coverage gap in cellular service and that there are no viable alternative sites (Industrial Tower and Wireless claims that 35 sites were identified and rejected), the ZBA must grant the variances sought, they say.

The applicant claims that there is a 3.5 by 1.5-mile coverage gap in Plympton that sees 7,000 to 8,000 vehicles a day pass through.

The public was not shy in their displeasure with the proposed tower.

Rosemary German, of 63 Palmer Street, presented videos of what she said were similar towers making humming noises. Angley said the site would be passive, emitting nothing, including noise. “This is the sound of a cellphone tower. No thanks!” you can hear German say in her video above a constant buzz.

Mike Matern, who is an electrical engineer, spoke heatedly regarding the noise issue, stating that the cooling fans on the new 4G equipment boxes are really quite noisy. He noted that electrical equipment and generators would also create noise.

Matern was a co-signer of a letter from the First Congregational Church in Plympton, along with Colleen Thompson, of Main Street, stating that no one in authority at the church had been approached by the applicant or inspected the steeple as an alternate site to Palmer Road, despite the fact that it is geographically higher by 60 feet, according to church officials.

“In addition to making sure that the information on which you will base your decision is as complete as possible, our interest in this hearing is not altogether altruistic. We have begun investigating the possibility of a wireless installation in the steeple. It is therefore of great interest to us to understand how the church was investigated and why it was rejected,” the letter states.

“How did you inspect the church if you didn’t come?” asked former selectman Colleen Thompson.

Angley, who at the last meeting stated that the church had been identified and rejected as a possible site, seemed taken aback by the letter as it was read into the record.

“You don’t need to go inside to know it won’t work,” an Industrial Wireless and Tower representative at the meeting said, stating that the height and girth of the steeple are prohibitive to new 4G technology. “We used to put equipment in church steeples. We don’t do that anymore.”

Carolyn Thompson responded that the Unitarian Universalist Church on Tremont Street in Duxbury has a four-array antenna inside its steeple.

There are several cellular arrays in church steeples in the area, including Central Square, Bridgewater, where there is a cellular array in the steeple of the Swedenborgian Church.

Other residents were concerned about the aesthetics of the tower, the rural and “country” nature of the town and the accuracy of the “balloon test,” in which a red balloon was floated to 120-feet to determine the exact visibility of the tower several weeks ago. Wetlands concerns were also raised.

Arthur Morin, of 11 Granville Baker Way, read the emailed comments of across the street neighbors who were not able to attend, claiming that even Police Chief Patrick Dillon witnessed the balloon from the historic district. Morin also added his own comments: “We choose to live in a rural community because we like the aesthetics…this erector set is ugly…this is all about making money.”

Carolyn Bartlett, who owns the house/business directly across the street from the proposed cell tower access road, argued that wind blew the balloon downward during many of the photographs presented by the applicant and she has photographs from the same location showing the red balloon plainly visible.  She furthered that many of the trees in the area are deciduous, not evergreen and will lose their leaves, making the tower even more visible in the fall and winter.

She got into a lengthy exchange with board chair Kenneth Thompson, a normally cool-headed character who lost his temper briefly, stating that Mrs. Bartlett was conflating different locations at once, including her house and the historic district.

When Thompson pointed out that both the state and local historical boards had sent letters that indicated the project does not concern them from a historic perspective, Bartlett asked incredulously, “You don’t believe the police chief?”

Other residents, notably Deborah Anderson, of Elm Street, and Art Morin of Granville Baker Way, encouraged the board reject or table the decision outright and seek proposals from other vendors or at least to repeat the balloon test in the fall after the leaves have fallen.

Thompson responded that they have to look at the case of the current applicant before the board.

As the residents finished vocalizing their long list of objections to the proposed project, the hearing moved into the deliberation phase, in which the board members discussed their vote.

Stein then proceeded to walk the members through the steps to approve the application, in what was beginning to appear to be a foregone conclusion. Stein indicated that the board’s hands were tied in denying the application.

“Do you find that there is a significant coverage gap?”

The board “deliberated,” mostly just head nodding, and Thompson responded, “Yes.”

“Do you find that there are no viable alternative sites?”

The board “deliberated,” again mostly just head nodding, and Thompson responded, “Yes.”

“So that triggers the protections under the 1996 T.C.A.”

Then the question of unanimity came up. A board member asked if the vote needed to be unanimous, and Stein responded affirmatively.

That’s when the mood in the room shifted dramatically.

Newly appointed ZBA member Harry Weikel immediately said, “I’m here to protect the people…that’s the only reason I accepted this appointment,” indicating the way he might vote.

Town Counsel Stein directly questioned Weikel, apparently to make sure he understood the implications of what he was saying.

Then, David Alberti, former board chairman, now board member, said he would support Weikel.

Thompson acknowledged that the vote appeared to be heading to a denial of the application.

Stein said that any denial must be based on substantial evidence in the local bylaw and warned that the town may end up defending this decision, if it is a denial, in court.

The applicant’s lawyer asked for a decision immediately. He even offered to build a “monopole” instead of a lattice structure if the ZBA preferred to incentivize the board to vote affirmatively for them.

They asserted that the board did not have to deliberate any further or collect evidence regarding the local zoning bylaw– advice that would appear to put the town at a disadvantage should any ruling be challenged in court. Stein called for a five-minute recess to do more research and left the room with her cell phone in hand.

When she returned, she asked for a week’s continuation of the hearing. The board voted to continue the hearing to Tuesday, July 31, at 6:30 p.m.

Only one “no” vote out of three is needed for the proposal to be denied. As of this week, it appears that the cellphone tower application will be denied and might very well end up in court. But, residents will have to wait another week to see how the board finally votes.

Much can change in one week.

After the hearing concluded, when asked if the board was committed to denying the application, Thompson said, “You’d have to ask us all individually.”  Weikel instantly chimed in with, “I am.”

PLYMPTON – Monday, July 16, the Plympton Board of Selectmen voted to exercise its right of first refusal at a hearing on that question regarding a Prospect Street 113 acre parcel known as the Atwood property. This vote triggers a flurry of activity as town officials hurry to meet upcoming deadlines to properly purchase the property for the town.

The vote, and the townspeople gathered for the hearing, were unanimous in their support for the open space project, spearheaded by Linda Leddy, co-chairperson of the Open Space Committee, and a group made up of many different committee members, informally known as the Prospect Street Working Group.

The site contains woods, wetlands, cranberry bogs and gravel hills. It is now a Chapter 61A property, which comes with significant tax benefits for the owners if they maintain the land for agriculture. Now that it is being sold, and the use of the property is slated to change, the town can exercise its right under state law to purchase the property first instead.

Using some of the $30,000 in pre-acquisition funds allocated at the annual town meeting, the groups studied the property carefully for water contamination and ecological benefits before making their recommendations to the board.

At Monday night’s meeting, first Open Space Committee co-chair Linda Leddy gave a slide-show tour of the site and invited two guest experts to speak about the property.

Peter Newton, a hydrogeologist from a Mattapoisset firm, was asked to determine if the water on the acreage could possibly be contaminated from landfills nearby.   Ultimately, he found no reason for concern with the hydrology of the site, even noting that a well is possible on the property, although the water, like much of the water in the area, may have high levels of iron, manganese and sodium.

“In my professional opinion, it is reasonable to not expect contamination,” he said.

Eric Walberg, an environmental planner from a Plymouth company, spoke to the unique ecological niche that properties such as this in rural parts of the state hold.

He spoke of the importance of preservation, for human recreation as well as for threatened and endangered species, and of the importance of resilient environments in the face of climate change.

Walberg stated that the Atwood property holds just such importance. “You guys really have an opportunity here…you are one of the few areas in the Taunton watershed that hasn’t faced development pressure,” said Walberg.

Next, Leddy outlined the plan to pay for the $800,000, 113-acre property.

Through a public procurement process, three small parcels totaling about 4.5 acres on Prospect Street will be sold by the town, raising $435,000. This was controversial, as Leddy said the OSC is not in the business of selling lots for houses, but that it was necessary for the overall project.

Another $65,000, at least, will hopefully come from private donations. Three donations have already been secured, according to selectman Mark Russo, totaling $25,000.

The remainder of the money needed, $300,000, will come from most, but not all, of the Community Preservation funds.

Russo commented on the financing plan: “I think it’s a beautiful model.”

While the board had questions of Leddy and the experts, especially selectman Christine Joy, the public had some questions but universally favorable comments.

When the hearing turned toward the evidence gathering stage of those for and against the project, about a dozen in the standing-room only meeting room spoke up in favor of the project, with one woman becoming quite emotional about the need to preserve open space for future generations.

The main topic of concern from the board and the public was that the purchase would not raise taxes. “I’m on the fence, and I just don’t want anything to affect taxes,” said Joy, the board’s most vocal member against tax increases.

“Where in this do you see taxes being raised, Christine?” responded Leddy.

Although there was some quibbling as to exactly whether Community Preservation funds are a tax, and Joy and Selectmen Chairman John Traynor both noted that they believed it was, the public was still supportive.

“I also take a little issue with the fact that the CPC [sic] is not a tax…when it comes out of your pocket…somehow it’s a tax,” said Traynor. “But it’s a good use of funds.”

Selectman Russo stated that the project would add no additional taxes to the tax bill.

Any property taxes taken off the tax rolls would more than be offset by the real estate taxes paid by the houses to be built on the three parcels, according to the town assessor Wendy Jones.

No one spoke, despite multiple opportunities, against the project.

In fact, after the board briefly deliberated and took their vote, there was lengthy applause from the townspeople gathered in the crowded and sweltering large meeting room at Town House.

Now, attorneys for the seller and the town must meet to draw up a purchase and sales agreement, under a strict timeline set out by state law – that the attorneys apparently don’t agree on.

Ultimately, this project must be approved by the voters, and the Selectmen, with Town Counsel, are meeting July 19 in executive session to further map out the path forward on the project.

The next regularly scheduled meeting of the Board of Selectmen is Monday, July 23, at 6 p.m.

PLYMPTON – On Tuesday, July 10, the Zoning Board of Appeals held a continued hearing on a proposed 120-foot, lattice-style telecommunications tower at the corner of Palmer Road and Center Street. The hearing drew several concerned residents, including those whose homes fall within several hundred feet of the proposed tower. Industrial Tower and Wireless of Marshfield, the telecommunication tower builder, represented by their attorney Jeffrey Angley, was present with new material for the ZBA. They also responded to inquiries from the board and residents.

ZBA chairman Kenneth Thompson allowed the company to present new and updated material first. The company performed a “balloon test,” in which a balloon was floated on string up to 120 feet June 26, and then photographed from different angles to simulate the visibility of the proposed structure.

While the company representatives claimed that the balloon was invisible or only barely visible at several of the 12 locations photographed, including from Town House more than half a mile away, residents – and board members – took issue with this.

ZBA members and residents came armed with photographs.

“I know it’s business zoned, but a lot of people live nearby,” said Carolyn Bartlett, a property owner who would directly face the 20-foot access road to the proposed tower. “Just to give you the benefit of the doubt, I think you took your photo when the balloon was blowing, because all of [my photos] showed the balloon.”

“I’m not proposing they’re invisible, they’re visible,” conceded Angley. “We were pretty pleased from how it looked from abutting properties,” said a colleague from the company.

The company also presented a report from an MIT scientist on the radiation effects of such a telecommunications tower, which they claim is all within FCC guidelines, a revised site plan including a wider access road per the request of the fire department and a letter from the Massachusetts Historical Commission claiming that the tower would have no impact on any historical sites.

Bartlett, who worked as a real estate agent for many years until retiring, suggested that the tower would reduce property values. “Whether it’s scientific or not, it’s emotional. [The tower is] going to impact decisions. It’s common sense.”

Another resident present, Rosemary German, of 63 Palmer Road, said her garage  is approximately 220 feet from the center of the tower, the closest abutter.

“I don’t believe it belongs, or they wouldn’t be here asking for variances,” she said. In an impassioned plea to the ZBA, noting that she came to Plympton for its rural character, German emphatically said several times to the board, “We depend on you to protect us.”

German raised several concerns, including noting that an endangered species of turtle is known to breed in the area.

Angley suggested that considering endangered species in their decision was outside the purview of the ZBA.

When German raised concerns about possible health effects, including cancer, Angley also stated that this was outside the purview of the ZBA.

According to Angley, federal law preempts state and local laws in telecommunications, and that gaps in service are required by federal law to be filled. Angley claims there is no other place to go, including other properties or even the church steeple, which they claimed was investigated for this purpose and rejected.

Another resident noted that, “Anecdotally, we have no problem [with cellphone service].”

The meeting eventually descended into confusion over exactly how to measure from the tower to abutting properties, and the board wished to notify an even wider swath of residents, within 800 feet of the center of the tower to the edge of their property lines.

This is more notification than is required by Plympton bylaws, but the board expressed that they wanted to make sure all those affected were aware of the situation.

The applicants were not pleased, pushing back on the further notification and delays.

Robert German, also of 63 Palmer Road, said, “They don’t care about human life, animal life…they’re just here to make money.”

Industrial Tower and Wireless representatives acknowledged that no one at the hearing was on their side. Nonetheless, they vowed to continue to push forward.

The ZBA will conduct a site visit within the next two weeks, and the hearing was continued until 6:30 p.m., Tuesday, July 24.

PLYMPTON – On Monday, June 25, selectmen met in Plympton to discuss a brief agenda. Halifax Selectman Kim Roy and Halifax Fire Chief Jason Viveiros were both present for ongoing discussions regarding shared fire services between Plympton and Halifax. The board also interviewed candidates for Highway Superintendent and had a heated discussion with ZBA Chairman Ken Thompson over Town Counsel hours.

Shared Fire Services Miscommunications

Kim Roy was not happy with the Plympton Board of Selectman on Monday. She expressed, “sadness and disappointment,” with Plympton officials for a breakdown in communications over the proposal.

The project, which would be the first of its kind in the Commonwealth, according to Roy, in its most likely iteration would see an inter-municipal agreement between the two towns, with Halifax acting as an “employment agency” for Plympton’s department. Each town would retain its identity as a department and would own its own equipment.

Roy expressed surprise that Plympton seemed to be discussing options that were already off the table, such as only sharing EMS services.  “We were getting informal requests throughout May…I was just so confused by the requests.”

The board and Roy agreed that they wanted to move forward with an aggressive timetable in exploring the plan and put the communications issues behind them.

Selectmen Chairman John Traynor said, “We’ve really been trying. You have to protect Halifax. We have to protect Plympton.”

Both selectmen Christine Joy and Mark Russo apologized for the breakdown in communications. “I’m absolutely aghast at how communications broke down,” said Russo, citing that everyone was well-intentioned.

The board set a July 9 meeting to discuss a draft agreement and budget with their fire consultant, Chief Lance Benjamino of Middleboro and Halifax officials. Halifax Chief Jason Viveiros is preparing those documents.

Discussing the ongoing status of the Plympton Fire Department, Traynor said of the leadership, “We’ve just had the wrong people,” and then, “We’ve come back from a dark place.”

Big shoes to fill

Two candidates were interviewed for the position of Highway Superintendent, a job made available by the retirement of James Mulcahy, who will retire June 30. 

The first applicant, Scott Ripley, who has worked as a Pembroke DPW foreman, grew up in Hanson. He has been with Pembroke DPW for 15 years, working closely with the Highway and Water Departments.

Ripley said, “I like to work with everybody,” when questioned on his management style, but that he needs to work on delegation. Selectman Joy noted that one goal of the board was to create a “master-plan” of the roads in town.

Ripley agreed this was a project he could collaborate on. Town Administrator Elizabeth Dennehy wanted to make sure that Ripley could, “wear many hats.”

“I don’t want to be bored,” Ripley replied.

Next, the younger and more local candidate, Robert Firlotte, of Plympton, has spent 13 years with the Plympton Highway Department.

Firlotte says he’s familiar with all aspects of the department, although he’d need to learn a bit more about budgeting.

He also agreed a master plan of the roads was an important project that he could work on.  Dennehy stated that she wanted to make sure that Firlotte would be able to take continuing education classes that she felt would be essential to his success at the job.

Firlotte said that this was something he was open to.

No date was proposed when the board’s choice would be announced.

ZBA gets TC hours, but not without an argument

Ken Thompson, chairman of the Zoning Board of Appeals, attempted to make a presentation to selectmen Monday, but was cut short because it was not on the agenda. “This board cannot discuss ongoing ZBA hearings,” said Dennehy.

Thompson protested, attempting to hand out documents outlining why the ZBA was attempting to meet with Town Counsel, and where that money was going.

He did not think the five hours that the board offered would be enough for the two weeks before the board met again.

“What do you want from this board?” snapped Traynor, “Is five hours enough?”

“No,” said Thompson, but he took it and left.

In other news:

• There was a brief update on the Atwood property. An informal working group of various members of different committees has been formed to explore various options for the town if it exercises it’s right of first refusal on the sale of the property.

• With the help of Town Clerk Tara Shaw, the Selectman appointed 46 committee members, 15 provisional appointments, and authorized the reorganization of several boards and committees such that they would have staggered terms in their membership.

• Town House summer hours begin next week.

• Town House will be closed on July 4 in observance of Independence Day.

• The following are upcoming Selectmen meetings:

• July 9, 6 p.m. including Fire discussions and Plympton Gas & Convenience liquor license transfer

• July 12, 6 p.m. joint meeting at Halifax Town Hall with Halifax officials regarding shared fire services.

• July 16, 6 p.m. open meeting and Right of First Refusal Hearing on the Atwood property.

•July 23, 6 p.m. open meeting.

On Thursday, June 21, 2018 Soi Dang, 34, formerly of 46A Wamsutta Avenue, Halifax, was found guilty of the 2015 second-degree murder of Marissa Randall, 19, of Revere. The dramatic and lengthy trial began on Monday, June 11, in Plymouth Superior Court, presided over by Judge Cornelius J. Moriarty, II.

Plymouth County Assistant District Attorneys Amanda Fowle and Jennifer Sprague alleged that Dang, a Vietnamese immigrant who once worked at Shaw’s in Carver, met Randall for the purpose of exchanging money for sex on Tuesday, November 17, 2015. The two had met once for the same purpose, they say, a week before, with no incident.

Dang picked Randall up in Revere that afternoon and drove her to Halifax.

After sex, they had a dispute that became physical over the amount of money to be exchanged, prosecutors say, during which Dang stabbed and choked Randall to death.

Dang bound Randall’s body and hid it in a closet, wrapped in a plastic tablecloth. He then drove to the Castle Island area of South Boston, took a 30-minute nap, and went to work the next morning at Shaw’s, according to the assistant district attorneys.

Randall’s body was discovered by Halifax police the day after the stabbing, said the district attorney’s office. Halifax police were searching for a missing Duxbury minor who they found with Dang that day by tracking her cellphone to his address. The girl, who Halifax police returned to Duxbury police, told Duxbury officers she had seen blood at Dang’s apartment, and that he said he had killed someone the night before.

Halifax Police returned to Dang’s home, where he freely let them in, and found blood, so they obtained a warrant to search the premises and contacted State Police. Halifax and State Police investigated the incident.

Opening the trial, the prosecution laid out a methodical case against Dang, who sat through the proceedings calmly. They entered over 100 exhibits into evidence and called multiple state scientists, crime scene investigators, and state police to the witness stand. The testimony was often confusing, slow, and filled with technical jargon.

But the picture that the testimony and evidence painted was damning. The final piece of evidence before the prosecution rested was an audio recording of an interrogation conducted primarily by lead investigator State Police Detective Paul MacDonald.

In the recording of the more than hour-long interview, Dang is casual as he admits to the violent stabbing he is accused of. His voice is emotionless as he chillingly explains, “Things just got out of control,” and that there was an “average amount of blood…it wasn’t like in the movies” after he killed Randall.

Next, the court-appointed defense attorney, Timothy Bradl, a former 13-year Suffolk County A.D.A., called Dr. Carl Dahlberg, an expert witness who is an ER doctor, to the stand to interpret toxicology reports conducted on Randall. The doctor testified that Randall had consumed Adderall and marijuana, and the dose of Adderall, an amphetamine, may have been enough to make her impulsive, euphoric, or manic. “It is reasonable to infer it was a larger dose than a doctor would prescribe,” he said.

After that, Dang testified in his own defense. He admitted to the stabbing but testified that Randall was agitated and that she had stabbed him with a screwdriver first, before he stabbed her with a knife. Upon cross-examination, however, he was nervous, seemed confused, and was unable to keep his testimony consistent. “I wasn’t thinking,” he said multiple times, when asked why he never mentioned the screwdriver to the police.

On Tuesday, June 19, the defense rested. The prosecution called one rebuttal witness, lead investigator Detective Macdonald, who testified that he knew of no wound consistent with a stabbing on Dang’s body. He also said that he didn’t know of Dang ever seeking medical assistance from the police, casting further doubt on Dang’s story of Randall attacking him.

The trial was unusual due to the busing of jurors under police escort to the crime scene in Halifax, the graphic nature of pictures and a video entered into evidence, and the length of time taken by all parties in conducting the case.

On Wednesday, the 16 jurors, who were evenly split between men and women, heard about 30 minutes of closing arguments from both the prosecution and defense.

The defense lawyer, Bradl, argued that the Commonwealth was unfairly entering graphic photos and a video into evidence and that Dang was a “passive guy.” He stated that the jury had a legal duty not to be too strict on self-defense.

The prosecution summed up their arguments as well, describing a horrific stabbing and an indifference to suffering on the part of Dang. “The words from his own mouth seal his fate,” said A.D.A. Sprague.

Judge Moriarty, a deliberate and soft-spoken man, spent about an hour instructing the jury on the law. He explained the two theories of murder in the first degree, on which Dang had been indicted, (one based on deliberate meditation and the other on extreme atrocity and cruelty), either or both of which can support a finding of guilty, and he instructed jurors on the two lesser charges of second-degree murder and voluntary manslaughter.

Twelve of the 16 jurors were randomly selected to deliberate on a verdict, while four were sequestered as alternate jurors. The final 12-person jury comprised seven women and five men, 11 of whom are Caucasian and one African-American.

The jury spent about 8 hours deliberating before delivering their verdict on Thursday.

When the verdict was read, Dang stood emotionless, in an ill-fiting blue shirt and khaki slacks.

Dang will be sentenced on Friday to the mandatory sentence of life imprisonment with the possibility of parole. The judge will hear arguments on parole and the victim’s family’s impact statement at that hearing.

The trial was attended frequently by family members of Randall, including her mother, Annmarie Stoilov, who was a witness to Randall’s character. “She was just getting her life together…I have one word for this trial: speechless. I’m speechless,” Stoilov said after the sixth day of the proceedings.

Stoilov became visibly overwhelmed and exited the courtroom several times during the trial. She was also chastised by the judge on the seventh day of proceedings for using her cellphone to photograph license plates of the defendant’s family members, angering defense counsel. “I can’t imagine the stress these proceedings have put you under,” the judge said, but he ordered her to cease taking photographs of the defendant’s family, defense counsel or their vehicles and threatened to call a mistrial or hold Stoilov in contempt of court if the photography continued. Stoilov said she would stop, and the judge said he would take her at her word.

Dang’s younger brother, older sister, mother and other supporters were present at different times during the trial.