The Kingston Police Department introduced its newest four-legged member and honored several officers and civilians for their heroic actions during the August 26 Board of Selectmen meeting.
Officer Brian Hurley presented Mabel, a 5-month-old yellow Labrador who recently completed comfort dog training through Professional Canine Services in Middleborough. The puppy, born on April Fool’s Day, comes from Pacheco Kennels in Raynham and is related to comfort dogs serving in neighboring communities.
“She is a full yellow lab. Both of her mother and father were yellow labs, Aries and Apollo,” Hurley said. “She’s actually sisters with Pembroke’s comfort dog, Sasha. One of Plymouth’s comfort dogs and as well as Plympton’s comfort dog, Aggie.”
Mabel accompanies Hurley at all times, both at home and on patrol. The department encourages community members to request the comfort dog for events and welcomes residents to interact with Mabel when they encounter the pair around town.
“If you have any events that you think that you may need a comfort dog for it, please feel free to request,” Hurley said. “And if you see me driving around, then feel free to say hello. And you can take pictures with the dog, pet the dog. She loves people and she’s been doing really well.”
As a NASRO-certified officer with the National Association of School Resource Officers, Hurley serves as backup to the district’s school resource officers, allowing him flexibility to visit any school when requested or during routine patrol stops.
Chief Brian Holmes presented multiple Police Commendation Awards recognizing exceptional service during two separate emergency incidents.
On July 30, Officer Potrykus, Lieutenant Skowyra, Dispatcher Odell, and Officer Hurley received recognition for their actions during a high-speed pursuit involving stolen property. The incident began when a resident reported someone attempting to steal a jet ski and trailer from their yard.
“Officer Potrykus observed a truck with the lights off that he turned around and followed the vehicle. A pursuit ensued, which went all the way down Route 3 into the rotary, and then it continued down Route 25, and it ended up terminating in New Bedford,” Chief Holmes said.
The pursuit resulted in one suspect’s apprehension, though a piece of debris from the fleeing vehicle struck the police cruiser’s windshield during the chase.
“Your actions reflect great credit upon yourself, the department, and maintain the highest traditions of law enforcement,” Holmes read from the commendation. “Congratulations on a job well done.”
The department also recognized two civilians for their life-saving actions during a water rescue on July 21. Harbormaster Tom Taylor and Assistant Harbormaster Glen Cavicchi received commendations for rescuing a distressed kayaker in the Jones River, though neither was available to attend the meeting.
The incident occurred when a kayaker became tangled in fishing line and overturned near Jones River Drive. Resident Tom Conner assisted the person in the water until the harbormaster’s boat arrived on scene.
“Mr. Conner was able to reach the person and help him stay afloat above the water until the rescue arrived on scene,” the Chief explained. “Your actions reflect great credit upon yourself, the department to maintain the high traditions of the law enforcement, and quite possibly save a life that day.”
Holmes also presented the department’s new mission statement and core values, developed through input from all department members. The mission statement emphasizes the department’s commitment to integrity, professionalism, service, and community partnership.
“The Kingston Police Department, guided by integrity, professionalism, service, and a deep commitment to the community, partners with the public to serve, support, and protect all inhabitants of the town of Kingston,” the mission statement reads.
The department’s four core values include integrity, defined as being “open and transparent in all things that we do”; community, recognizing that “we are the public and we cannot do this job without you”; professionalism, acknowledging that “policing is a profession” requiring education and training; and service, emphasizing their role as “law enforcement officers, dispatchers, administrators, leaders, and public servants.”
The board also accepted a donation from Plymouth County District Attorney Tim Cruz, including a life pack 1008ED, wall mounting case, and two NALOX boxes containing Narcan. These items will be provided to the recreation department.
In other business, the board began preparations for hiring a new Town Administrator following Keith Hickey’s upcoming departure. The board approved a position statement and job description for the role, with an annual salary of $180,000 plus or minus depending on qualifications.
The board established a screening committee consisting of two selectmen, the Police Chief, Fire Chief, and HR Manager to review applications. Chairman Eric Crone and board member Donald Alcombright will represent the selectmen on the committee.
The Town Administrator position requires a bachelor’s degree with a master’s preferred, along with experience in municipal government, financial management, and personnel administration. The ideal candidate should demonstrate strong leadership qualities and knowledge of municipal law.
Continuation of Ricketts Pond 60-Unit 40B Hearing
The Plympton Zoning Board held another public hearing on August 27 for the proposed Ricketts Pond Estates 60-unit, 40B development. Suzanne Jafferian, ZBA Chairman, opened the hearing along with her ZBA members, Ethan Stiles, David Alberti, Alan Wheelock, and missing was Lukasz Kowalski. Jafferian welcomed everyone and then turned the proceedings over to Stiles who introduced peer-reviewing principal engineer from JDE Civil, Inc., Gregory Driscoll. Stiles stated that Driscoll had submitted a nine-page review and report about the applicants’ Peter Opachinski of SLT Constructions, storm water management report. Stiles suggested that Driscoll present his remarks to the board, but Opachinski interjected and suggested their civil engineer, Erik Schoumaker, of McKenzie Engineering Group, Inc., be allowed to present the plans for the storm water management design prior to Driscoll’s remarks. Stiles agrees that this was reasonable and the floor was set for Schoumaker to begin his civil site plans presentation.
Schoumaker reiterated that they did, indeed, receive Driscoll’s comments and review letter dated August 20 and that they were going to review said comments and hoped to submit a revision of their site plans incorporating Driscoll’s feedback. The Ricketts Pond storm water management plans were presented to the board and the attending public on large posters set on an easel as well as on a projector screen on the wall. Schoumaker began walking the board through the site plans -starting with a depiction of the site’s current day condition. Schoumaker stated that the entire lot is 24.4 acres and over a million square feet and that the Carver-Plympton town line runs across the southern portion of the property. The frontage road and access to the subdivision would be from Carver but all of the structures to be built would be located on the Plympton side of the town line.
Schoumaker then explained that the composition of the site consists mainly of stockpiles of sand and gravel and access paths that run through the area. He went on to state that the topography of the land consists of undeveloped woodlands and pockets of vegetative wetlands. Schoumaker verified that the land is located in a FEMA Zone x -meaning the site is determined to be outside a 500‐year flood threat and protected by levee from a 100-year flood -thus being an area of minimal flooding hazard. The presented poster map showed that the stormwater runoff flows to a low point, which in this case is a pocket of wetlands that eventually drains into Ricketts Pond. Schoumaker then indicated the marked soil testing holes on the map and reported that they dug in excess of 10 feet down and found nothing much aside from sand and no groundwater. He claims this made their storm water management design much easier.
The next poster showed the current layout with the cul-de-sac road and Ricketts Pond Drive, where an industrial park is located and where a few of the lots were under construction and still needed permitting. Five poster sheets in showed the lotting plan with 25 proposed single-family units, a 40 foot right-of-way and a road that has yet to be named. Schoumaker said that the lots range in size from 15,000 square feet to 50,350 square feet -the largest lot, 17, abutting wetlands. He then showed that Road A will connect with Ricketts Pond Drive and provide a 140 diameter. He assured the board that this was plenty of room for delivery trucks and emergency vehicles to turn around in.
The comprehensive layout plan for the number of duplex units developed was presented next. SLT Construction is proposing 30 duplexes which would be 60 residential units from that type of housing. Each unit would be 1,860 square feet with 24 ft wide driveways and single car garages but with ample room for two cars. The 1,536 ft subdivision roadway would be composed of bituminous concrete for durability and weather resistance and lined with a foot wide Cape Cod Berm -a barrier commonly used in coastal areas to protect from storm surges and flooding. Schoumaker then reiterated that they tried to design structures and roadways far away enough to not disturb the wetlands scattered throughout the area. “One of the decks is 50 feet away from the IVW (isolated vegetative wetlands) and this is our closest disturbed area with that portion of the building,” Schoumaker explained.
The next presented chart showed SLT’s grading and drainage plan for the development. “Our goal was to design a drainage system that complied with the 2, 10, 25, and 100 year storm events,” stated Schoumaker, “We want to attenuate those storms and we want to comply with all the local and state storm water management regulations. So that was our goal for design.” In addition, in pre and post development, a watershed of 23 ½ acres was analyzed to design the storm system in such a way as to use the wetlands as design points to reduce peak rates and volumes directed at those areas in the event of heavy flooding or drainage. This would be done by using a closed drainage system in the street that consists of a series of catch basins and drain manholes to funnel the storm water into said basins and then funnel the water into an infiltration basin. The infiltration basin provides the total suspended solids removal and is intended to rather treat the storm water before it gets infiltrated into the native soil. Schoumaker stated that this was all in compliance with the local storm water management regulations that accomplished the intended water recharge and TSS removal.
The next presented aspect of the development concerned the utility plan for the wells and septic systems for the Ricketts Pond development. Underground electricity for each lot would be sized based on each individual septic system and kept within the legally required buffer zone between wells and septic systems. “We will obviously work in conjunction with Plympton Board of Health as we get further along in development to finalize these designs, but we wanted to make sure everything fit,” Schoumaker explained. The plans showed that each two-family unit will have its own septic and well.
Stiles interjected with a question asking if the leaching field was per well or per lot and asked how that would work. Schoumaker stated that it would drain into a shared septic tank and then into the leaching fields which were calculated depending on the number of bedrooms on the lot -with one leaching field per duplex. Wheelock raised a question asking for clarification on whether the larger lots, particularly the 15,000 square foot lot, would have one septic and two wells or one septic and one well. Schoumaker answered that there would only be one septic and one well for said lot, but that could be subject to change as these plans were all preliminary in nature. Jafferian then asked for clarification about the number of required septic tanks and their sized being based off of the number of bedrooms in any given unit. Schoumaker replied that it is based off of Title 5 regulations, which measure by factoring 110 gallons of waste water per day per bedroom.
The final point of Schoumaker’s presentation was concerning the roadway profile and the drainage structures in the roadway of the Ricketts Pond development. The plans show no conflicting utilities and roadway grades of 1.1%-1.7% with a high point at the Carver town line to divide up storm water drainage. This ensures that the runoff from Carver stays in Carver and the runoff from Plympton stays in Plympton. Stiles again wanted to clarify that the applicant’s plans were designed as one well and one septic per lot no matter the amount of buildings on the lot, to which Schoumaker verified this was correct, but restated that they would be working with the Plympton Board of Health to make changes as needed after soil testing was done on each lot and submitted for review. He also stated that the septic sizes would vary depending on if the lot is servicing single vs duplex housing units.
Alberti then addressed a question about the wells indicated on the plans where, in one area, a single well is shown to service two duplexes -meaning a single well is supposed to service four families. Schoumaker responded, “Depending on well testing, if it’s possible, we would like to do that as shown in the plan. If we have to change up the design because utility plan is preliminary in nature, we’ll deal with that if we have to.”
Stiles followed up with an inquiry on the provided storm water management areas and questioned if they are located in the wetlands or adjacent to the wetlands. Schoumaker concluded that they are located adjacent to the wetlands. “It is an infiltration basin, so it’s really a depression in the ground. We take a portion of the cul-de-sac, we capture the runoff, and we send it to that basin. Luckily here we have sand so we can infiltrate all of the runoff going there. And then we include a small emergency overflow and just direct that at the wetland. But you can see the 100 year storm label on the plan never even makes it up to that emergency overflow. So it’s next to the wetland but I believe we’re about, we’re over 50 ft away with that one.”
Continuing on the storm water management plans, Shoumaker explained that a pre development watershed study was done to determine the flow patterns of the current lot and then determine how much runoff is going to each property line and how much is going into the wetlands. He pointed out that several strategically placed infiltration basins were needed instead of one drainage point to ensure there was no overflowing and to comply with state and local regulations.
Jafferian then asked about previous experiences developing wetland areas. “So, you’ve done plans like this before -for multiple units and this is common for you. Have you seen projects like this so close to wetlands developed successfully?” To which Shoumaker replied that he had and under much less favorable soil conditions. He also relayed that this site was one of the easier to manage and design around due to it being mostly sand.
A question was posed about the development residents all being under an HOA. Brad McKenzie, from McKenzie Engineering responded. “Each lot will be its own condo association. And overarching all of that would be a Homeowners Association because it’s really no different than a single-family subdivision… So again, each lot, whether it be one or two duplexes, would be its own condo association. As the plans are further developed into final construction plans. the legal documents are prepared there will be exclusive use areas, common areas designated on plans to be recorded at the registry of deeds along with unit deed plans and master deed plans.”
Concluding the presentation by Shoumaker, Driscoll was asked if he wanted to respond to anything. He concluded that his responses were very technical in nature and that he did not have questions that were not already included in the review letter that was submitted to the board and the applicant. After deliberation about the appropriate timeline for proposed reviews and responses from the peer review engineer and the applicants engineer for further components of the project, including the traffic study, the next hearing was set to take place on Wednesday, Oct. 8 at 6:30 p.m.
Following the hearing date, the board allowed questions to be asked by the town attendees. Several local residents in attendance raised questions and concerns about the well and septic systems as well as roadway access and design. Debbie from Forest Street asked for a breakdown of the number of bedrooms per unit and also the septic capability requirements set forth by the Title 5 regulations. The plans previously presented in the hearing were reiterated. Wheelock then mentioned a statement in a previous hearing from Paul Cusson of Delphic Associates, LLC. where the units were predicted to average about 2 ½ residents per unit, meaning the Ricketts Pond project would result in an increase of 150-200 new residents in Plympton. Stiles then pointed out that this increase in population and the demand it would place on local municipal resources like the fire department, school, and police department could not be considered because of the applicant applying under a 40B.
Next, Town Council, Carolyn Murray, asked for clarification about the size and capacity of the roadway and referred to the language in the presentation that it “should be sufficient” for passage and turn-around of emergency vehicles but and asked if a swept path analysis had been done. Shoumaker replied that the measurements were taken out of the regulations for Plympton and that there was also software that could mimic the exact turn radius of a fire truck and that could be calculated and shown on the plans.
After these comments, John Traynor asked about the water supply available beyond what was available on the tanker in the event of an emergency. He asked if there had been discussions with the fire department to perhaps build something underground for water storage that could be used by the fire department, to which McKenzie replied that there had not been any discussions about this but they were certainly open to discussions concerning this matter with the fire department.
Tina Davies then asked how many of the town bylaws were not applicable to the Ricketts Pond Development. Stiles replied that it was due to the project being filed under the 40B law and therefore the applicant is able to bypass many local laws. Lastly, Mary McGrath and Arthur Bloomquist raised concerns about the parking spaces and design of the road to handle traffic flow and emergency vehicles. McKenzie replied that the designs were preliminary and adjustments could be made later on to better accommodate multiple cars for gatherings or emergency and delivery vehicles. The hearing was then adjourned until Oct. 8.
To follow along on this project, please visit the town website for all available public transcripts, maps, presented material, statements, and forthcoming hearings and news.
https://www.town.plympton.ma.us/home/pages/ricketts-pond-estates-proposed-40b
Plympton Selectmen Question $60,000 Historic Door Project
The Plympton Board of Selectmen spent significant time at their August 18 meeting debating a Community Preservation Committee-approved project to replace the front entrance doors at the town house facing Palmer Road. The $60,000 project, already approved by both the CPC and town meeting, would replace deteriorating doors that are currently bolted shut due to weatherproofing issues.
Board Chair Dana Smith raised concerns about the expense, noting that the doors would serve no functional purpose since the building has two ADA-accessible entrances on either side. “It just seems to be a very steep price tag,” Smith said. “It’s still a door that’s not going to be utilized in this building.”
Fellow Selectman and CPC Chair Mark Russo defended the project, explaining that it represents historic preservation work that qualifies for Community Preservation Act funding. “This project was seen as the first step on much, much more that will have to be done up front,” Russo said. He emphasized the thorough vetting process, noting the project went through multiple meetings before town meeting approval.
The debate revealed tension between fiscal concerns and established municipal processes. Selectman Nathaniel Sides supported continuing the project despite cost concerns, stating, “I think the process was there. It was followed. It was followed to the T.” However, he suggested looking for ways to reduce costs by 20%.
Residents Art Morin and Deb Anderson participated in discussion about the town house door project. Morin suggested using Silver Lake vocational students to reduce costs, while Anderson defended the CPC process and emphasized that structural repairs justify the expense. Both highlighted the importance of fiscal responsibility while maintaining historic preservation standards.
Morin’s suggestion involving Silver Lake Regional High School’s vocational program gained support from other board members. “The vocational department has built houses from Metal Fab,” said Highway Superintendent Robert Firlotte, who attended the vocational school. “If you have an architect design it, they can do it.”
Town Administrator Liz Dennehy clarified that most of the project cost involves structural repairs around the doors rather than just door replacement. The doors are currently causing maintenance issues, with the custodian having to repeatedly clean up falling plaster and deal with plastic weatherproofing that blows down.
The board ultimately voted 2-1 to ask the Town Properties Committee to revisit the project “in a more fiscally responsible way and looking at things to be done outside the box.” Russo cast the dissenting vote, expressing concerns about setting a “horrible precedent” by second-guessing approved CPA projects.
In other significant business, the Highway Department received approval for a comprehensive update from Superintendent Robert Firlotte. The department finalized a new waste management contract with an 8% increase after initially rejecting a much higher proposal. Firlotte reported that Waste Management had initially sent “the wrong contract” with “huge” increases before providing acceptable terms.
The board also addressed several infrastructure projects, including catch basin replacement on Colchester Road and culvert work on Winnetuxet Road. Furlong reported that the department’s flail mower was totaled in an accident, with insurance providing $17,000 toward a $40,000 replacement.
Sides, recently elected after serving on the Finance Committee, expressed frustration with the annual line item transfer process. The board approved $139,683 in year-end transfers, with Sides noting that some departments exceeded their budgets by 6-8%. “That didn’t happen overnight,” he said, requesting quarterly budget updates to avoid surprises.
Looking ahead, Dennehy reported that Animal Inspector Brian Kling will retire in January 2026, giving the town time to find a replacement for the specialized position. She also announced completion of the town’s MBTA zoning compliance application and ongoing work to upgrade the municipal website to be mobile-friendly.
Halifax loses grant due to MBTA Communities Non-Compliance
Halifax has lost a $61,608 Green Communities grant due to its non-compliance with the MBTA Communities Act, marking the first confirmed financial penalty the town faced for refusing to adopt required multifamily zoning, after redirecting a prior Silver Lake Regionalization Study grant to Kingston.
The Department of Energy Resources notified Interim Town Administrator Robert Fennessy that while Halifax was selected to receive the grant for energy efficiency projects in municipal and school buildings, the funds cannot be awarded due to the town’s non-compliant status under Massachusetts General Law Chapter 40A, Section 3A.
“Awards under this program are contingent upon a municipality being able to certify that it will comply with all applicable laws,” the department wrote in a letter to Fennessy. “To be eligible to receive awards under the Green Communities Competitive Grant Program, the town would need to remediate this noncompliance.”
The grant rejection comes as the state intensifies enforcement of the MBTA Communities Act. The Executive Office of Housing and Livable Communities sent Halifax a formal non-compliance letter stating the town failed to submit a district compliance application by the July 14 deadline.
“Halifax remains non-compliant with Section 3A,” wrote Secretary Edward Augustus Jr. in the letter, which was copied to the town’s state legislative delegation. “As the Supreme Judicial Court held in Attorney General v. Town of Milton, compliance with the law is mandatory and enforceable by the Attorney General.”
Board of Selectmen Chair Jonathan Selig acknowledged the financial consequences were expected but said the town remains committed to its position.
“The town spoke. The Board of Selectmen is clear. We got the message loud and clear,” Selig said, referring to strong community opposition expressed at previous meetings. “We did warn the community that this is a distinct reality. It wasn’t a scare tactic. We just wanted to give those folks some foresight as to what was coming.”
Selectman Thomas Pratt called the grant loss “a formality” and said it came as “no surprise.”
“We kind of knew that’s where we were. We had some choices to make to get an interim compliance and we declined to do so,” Pratt said.
The town continues pursuing legal challenges to the MBTA Communities Act. Fennessy testified before the state legislature in July supporting three bills authored by Representative Ken Sweezey that would modify or repeal the act, though the bills have not advanced from committee.
Fennessy warned that more grant rejections may follow, noting that many applications now include compliance check boxes at the top.
“Unfortunately they know our status right now,” Selig said about the state’s awareness of Halifax’s position.
The MBTA Communities Act requires certain municipalities to create zoning districts allowing multifamily housing as-of-right. Halifax was required to zone for at least 1,750 new housing units but has refused to comply, joining a small number of communities statewide in active resistance to the law.
In other business, the board approved an Eagle Scout project by Paul Beauchesne to refurbish dugouts at the town’s minor baseball fields. The project will include cleaning, repairing, and painting the concrete dugouts, which Selig described as “lovingly referred to as the prison dugouts.”
“Those dugouts are really, really snug and really, really needing some TLC,” Selig said. The $500 project is expected to take about a week to complete.
The board also received an update on a veterans memorial honoring Josh Curtis, a Halifax resident who died in 2025. Veterans of Foreign Wars representative David Walsh said the polished granite bench is expected to arrive by late August or early September, with dedication planned for Veterans Day at 11 a.m.
“On the back it will say Joshua Aaron Curtis. Straight across. 1986 to 2025. Hero in combat. Hero in life,” Walsh said.
The board delayed action on a three-year asphalt rubber surface treatment contract with All States Construction after resident Frank Johnston questioned the lack of a not-to-exceed value in the agreement. The contract establishes unit prices for road work but does not cap total spending.
“I’ve never signed an open contract with no dollar value attached,” Johnston said. “It’s called a not-to-exceed and NTE attached to that contract.”
Board members agreed to table the matter until Highway Superintendent Steve Hayward can provide clarification at the next meeting.
The town received positive financial news with $555,544 in Chapter 90 highway funds from the state, including a supplemental allocation. Halifax also received the first payment of $93,655 from a PFAS lawsuit settlement with 3M, with additional payments expected over several years.
Fennessy said the PFAS settlement money, which could total around $400,000 for Halifax, will likely support ongoing landfill monitoring and maintenance costs.
The board approved library staffing arrangements for when Director Dylan Benoit takes paternity leave in late September. Maria Bumpus will serve as acting director at her previous interim rate, while Jean Gallant will provide substitute coverage at $18.88 per hour.
Halifax continues operating with an Interim Town Administrator while conducting a search for a permanent Town Administrator. Fennessy, who completed his first month in the role, praised the town staff and said he is “very excited to work here with these people.”
Hickey resigns, new TA search begins
The Kingston Board of Selectmen is moving forward with plans to find both an interim and permanent town administrator following the resignation of Keith Hickey, who announced his departure at the Wednesday, Aug. 6 selectmen’s meeting, to take a position in Fairhaven.
Hickey’s contract includes a 90-day notice period, keeping him employed through the town until late October, though the board is considering allowing him to leave earlier if suitable replacements are found. Board members discussed the transition timeline during their Aug. 5 meeting, with several expressing preference for a two-week overlap period between Hickey and his successor.
“I would like to see us work with Keith here to see if we could get to a point where we can, in effect, release him earlier,” said Carl Pike, suggesting a target date of Oct. 1 instead of the full 90-day period. “I would think, from my point of view, that we probably absolutely going to need him for 60 days.”
The board faces the challenge of conducting two separate searches while managing the town’s tight budget situation. Members debated whether to hire a professional search firm, which typically costs $15,000 to $20,000, or conduct the search internally using a committee approach.
Chair Eric Crone expressed concerns about the financial implications given the town’s budget constraints. “We’re literally saying we’ve got $3,000 and then probably less available under the levy,” Crone said. “It’s hard to then say, oh, well, let’s spend the money when we could do it, I think.”
Pike acknowledged the financial reality while noting that finding the money should be possible within the town’s $50 million to $60 million budget. “The town should always be able to find that in a 50 million dollar budget,” Pike said. “I don’t care if you have to cut back some overtime somewhere, or you don’t buy this equipment.”
However, Pike also supported starting the search process internally, suggesting the board could reassess and hire a search firm later if needed. “I absolutely agree that any place we don’t have to spend money in the next eight or ten months, whatever’s left, I personally will be charging forward and saying, hey, do we have to spend that?”
The board plans to establish a search committee for the permanent position, likely including two selectmen and potentially department heads or other town officials. Vice Chair Kim Emberg suggested involving the Police Chief, Fire Chief, or HR Director in the process.
For the interim position, the board discussed a more streamlined approach. Town Counsel Kate Feodoroff indicated that interim appointments do not require the same formal interview process as permanent hires, allowing for more flexibility in selection and timing.
“Kate made it sound like you don’t put interims through rigorous process,” Crone said. “You’re just hiring whoever’s available, whoever’s willing to do it.”
The board expressed interest in finding an interim administrator who could potentially become a permanent candidate, though they emphasized that any interim would need to go through the full application process for the permanent positin.
Donald Alcombright raised concerns about limiting the candidate pool by focusing on interim-to-permanent transitions. “I just don’t want to be in that situation where we’re basically reaching out to three specific candidates that we’re thinking about as opposed to having 30 people apply,” he said.
Hickey offered to assist with the transition, noting his availability to help whoever takes over the position. “I’m a phone call and email or text away, so if I can help whoever’s sitting in that chair, you know, I’m always going to be willing to do that,” he said.
The outgoing Town Administrator highlighted several ongoing projects that will need attention during the transition.
“You know, I guess from my point of view, over the next few weeks, you know, we’ve got a fall town meeting in October,” Hickey said. “I’m working with Kathleen Barrette, our Finance Director. I’ve reached out to the School to try to put together a five-year financial plan.”
The board also discussed gathering input from department heads about desired qualities in the next administrator. Hickey suggested meeting with department heads as a group rather than individually to provide more constructive feedback.
“One of the things I think would be important, whether it be just two board members so there’s not a posted meeting, you know, maybe meet with the department heads as a group,” Hickey said.
Before beginning the search process, the board needs to finalize the job description used in the previous search in 2020. Pike noted that the current description needs cleanup for grammar and duplications, though the overall content remains appropriate.
The board plans to continue discussions about the search process at future meetings, with members emphasizing the need to move quickly while maintaining thoroughness in the selection process.
The Town Administrator position oversees daily municipal operations and serves as the Chief Administrative Officer under Kingston’s Open Town Meeting form of government. The role involves coordinating between various departments, managing budgets, and implementing policies set by the Board of Selectmen.
Ricketts Pond 60-unit 40B project estates heard
The Plympton Zoning Board held a public hearing on July 29 for the proposed Ricketts Pond Estates 40B development. Suzanne Jafferian, ZBA Chairman, opened the hearing along with her zoning board members Ethan Stiles, David Alberti, and Lukasz Kowalski. The applicant, Peter Opachinski of SLT Construction, who is proposing a 60-unit housing development in the Ricketts Pond area, was represented in the hearing by Paul Cusson of Delphic Associates, LLC.
The meeting began with the zoning board recapping that they had selected their peer reviewing engineer, Gregory Driscoll, Principal Engineer at JDE Civil, Inc. and that they anticipated a presentation from the representative of McKenzie Engineering, the engineering group on the development team for the Ricketts Pond Estates, during the hearing per previous discussion at the last hearing. When the floor was given to begin the presentation, however, Cusson explained that there would not be a presentation. He said their understanding was a bit different from the zoning boards requests.
Cusson said they had submitted plans, including a storm water management plan, to be reviewed by the ZBA consulting engineer, Driscoll, and that they hoped to be able to respond to the review as that was the main purpose of the night’s hearing. Cusson also assured that the applicant had made the deposit for peer review by Driscoll, but there didn’t seem to be any point in a complex, detailed engineering presentation because Driscoll had not yet been given authorization to proceed on his peer review report. This meant that the applicant’s engineer from McKenzie had nothing to respond to and therefore the anticipated presentation for the evening would not take place.
Ethan Stiles responded in an attempt to address this discrepancy. Stiles said that he did, indeed, receive the deposit check from SLT for the peer review cost per Driscoll, and that he took it to the town treasurer to deposit into a 53G account, and that the ZBA would review the bills via Driscoll and pay out the deposit amount bit by bit as the bills came in, but he admitted that perhaps this was not how the deposit was supposed to be paid out. Stiles asked town council, Carolyn Murray, to clarify if this was how Driscoll was supposed to be paid for his services, amounting to $15,000.00, rather than paying out the entire sum at once. Murray confirmed that payments were, in fact, to be made from the 53G account for this project as bills came in rather than all at once.
Driscoll then responded saying that he had received and signed the contract from the town but was waiting for deposit money to be paid out to begin the peer review. Driscoll said that he would have his bookkeeper send an invoice to the town to get the process moving along. Murray confirmed that once the contract was signed by Driscoll a portion of the deposit should have been paid to Driscoll so the peer review could begin, but said that having an invoice from JDE Civil, Inc. would be preferable to the town accountant to provide a “paper trail” of the financial exchange. Town Council also clarified that the deposit would be paid out by the building administrator who pays bills on behalf of the ZBA by requesting checks to be cut by the town treasury via invoice.
After the confusion for the process of getting the peer review started by Driscoll was resolved, and a detailed explanation of the forthcoming peer review interactions between both parties was given to the ZBA by Cusson, a motion was made for the intended presentation by McKenzie to take place on Wednesday, Aug. 27 at 6:30 p.m. Once the engineer’s peer reviews are completed, both Driscoll and the McKenzie engineer will prepare responses to one another via the peer review document to work out details and discrepancies on the Ricketts Pond project.
The second order of business for the hearing related to the traffic study. Immediate concerns were brought forth by Cusson about the cost of the traffic study review. The ZBA peer review engineer, Driscoll, did not have a traffic engineer on staff so the outside services of an engineer specializing in traffic studies would be needed for this project. Cusson said that their hired traffic engineer, Jeffrey Dirk of Vanasse & Associates, Inc., for the Ricketts Pond project was asked to provide a detailed overview of what the traffic study would entail. Cusson claims their response was submitted to Driscoll on June 10. Cusson also explained that the response as to the scope of the traffic study was lengthy and detailed beyond what it would normally would be.
Cusson then went on to explain that Dirk’s quoted fee was $12,000. Cusson remarked that this quote was a bit higher than normal but within an acceptable range. The discrepancy then came to light that when the ZBA sought a quote for a peer review of the traffic study via Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. Their quote was much higher, at $21,000. Cusson wanted to know why it would cost twice as much for the review of the report as it would to prepare the actual report. Cusson also remarked that he had provided a list of other firms to get quotes from that were likely more reasonable. Kowalski assured Cusson that he had contacted all of the resources provided and that the ZBA was not going to simply go with the cheapest option to accommodate SLT Construction and that Bowman was a very reputable and large company.
Cusson interrupted and said that they would not pay $21,000 for a review of a report that should cost a fraction of that quote and Opachinski interjected that the cost of the review should be a fraction of what he is paying Dirk to do the actual groundwork and study. Kowalski pointed out that the price SLT Construction chooses to pay their traffic engineer is irrelevant to the ZBA. Cusson heatedly responded that it is not irrelevant and that the cost incurred in hiring Bowman was unjustified and unfair. Cusson then asked that the board consider the proposal to seek quotes from other companies instead of accepting the Bowman offer.
Kowalski responded that he had already contacted all the suggested companies and some were completely irrelevant to the project and not options to consider. The only other company that had provided a quote and was a reputable company relative to the traffic study review needed was from Howard Stein Hudson in Boston. Cusson pointed out that he was familiar with this company as he and his clients had hired them before and their high standing reputation was confirmed all around by both parties. The proposal via Stein Hudson was $8,000.00 -a much lower quote than that from Bowman while providing similar services and depth of review. Stiles agreed that this proposal was likely to be more acceptable to SLT and also could move things along quicker than extending the debate on costs of services, but Kowalski interjected with a proposed motion to hire Bowman on the spot for the review of the traffic study.
Stiles asked for the proposals to be shown on screen so all in the room could see them and expressed that he was not insensitive to the concerns of the applicant in terms of the cost of the Bowman review. Kowalski expressed concern that perhaps the proposal from Stein Hudson was lower because they were familiar with SLT and giving them an undisclosed discount, but Cusson pointed out that this was untrue and that in his thirty years of experience with developments they usually only pay between $4,000 – 6,000 for a peer review of a traffic study -a far cry from $21,000.
Stiles agreed that the Stein Hudson proposal seemed adequate in detail and content in comparison to the services Bowman offered and suggested it would be the more prudent approach to go with the Stein Hudson proposal for review of SLT’s traffic study. Wanting to move on from the lengthy debate Kowalski withdrew his motion to hire Bowman and made a new motion to hire Stein Hudson for the traffic study peer review. The motion was passed unanimously.
Lastly, a moment was opened at the end of the hearing for anyone to voice additional concerns and the floor was taken by Eric Donovan of 66 Winnetuxet in Plympton. He expressed concern that the hearings were taking place in the summer when most town constituents were unavailable and on vacation. Donovan stated that his cousin lives almost directly across from the proposed Ricketts Pond development and he, along with many other local residents are very concerned about the legitimate impact this development proposes in terms of population and tax increase. Donovan pointed out that the hearings would be better attended by locals if they were held in the fall once the vacation months are over. Stiles responded that they are guided by the legal response deadline of six months from the time the applicant filed their application for development. Stiles also pointed out that the hearings are being broadcast via the town website on the Area 58 channel and available at all times to the public. Donovan then addressed Opachinski and asked, “How many units do you really want?” He then explained that he is from Boston and is familiar with developments being proposed at a certain number of units but in reality, the developer intends to build many more than is disclosed in their initial proposal. The ZBA assured Donovan that they will get to the bottom of that in time. Jafferian assured Donovan that the public would have a chance to come forward and voice concerns as the hearings progressed as well. Donovan responded that he moved to Plympton because it was a “sleepy little town” and this development would change that. Following Donovan’s remarks the hearing was adjourned until the next meeting in late August.
If you would like to become involved in the proceedings for a project that will have a significant impact on Plympton’s environment -including several wetland areas, population, and taxes, please visit the town website under Town Resources: Ricketts Pond Estate Proposed 40B for the publicly available documents and either attend the next hearing on Aug. 27 at 6:30 p.m. at the Town House, 5 Palmer Rd., or watch the hearing live or afterward on the Area 58 Channel -linked on the town website and found under the search: Zoning Board. As a small town, residents should be involved and voice their opinions to preserve the things they love about their little but unique town in an age where it seems every spot of empty land is developed.
A Tale of Two Transitions
The town of Halifax is once again undergoing a significant leadership transition, with Town Administrator Cody Haddad having recently resigned at the end of July 2025 and Select Board Chair John Bruno not seeking reelection last May. This current transition, however, stands in stark contrast to the turbulent period Halifax experienced in late 2022, marking a notable shift in the town’s civic atmosphere.
In August 2022, Halifax was plunged into an unprecedented crisis when two members of its three-person Select Board, Ashley DiSesa and Alexander Meade, and the new Town Administrator, Marty Golightly, all resigned on the same day. This left Jonathan Selig as the sole remaining Selectman, holding biweekly meetings and daily operations as a “one-man band” for 76 days. Selig noted at the time, “It’s a little strange, I’m not going to lie,” but stated he was “starting to get the hang of being a one-man band here”. Procedurally that involved regularly making a motion, seconding his own motion, and voting 1-0 to approve it.
Among the tensions preceding the departures was a proposed renovation to a cranberry bog by Morse Brothers, Inc., that residents believed would overwhelm their neighborhood. Meetings from April to August 2022 grew “increasingly hostile,” with neighbors shouting over representatives fearing potential damage to roads, danger to children, water contamination, and decreased home values. Some even claimed the bog project was a “coverup for a strip mine”.
The resigning officials cited a deeply “toxic” environment. Town Administrator Marty Golightly, who had only been appointed in mid-July 2022, stated it “wasn’t the right fit” for him. He had previously faced “personal attacks and threats” in his role as Director of Public Health in Abington during the pandemic, which made working in his community uncomfortable. Select Board Chair Ashley DiSesa described enduring a “storm of misogyny, sexual harassment, and underestimation by a select group of loud-mouth residents”. Co-chair Alexander Meade reported being “threatened,” “verbally attacked,” and at one point needed to use an alternate exit to evade an “angry crowd” outside Town Hall. He noted the emergence of “misplaced negative rhetoric and a mob mentality”. The emergency meeting where these resignations occurred lasted only about four minutes.
With basic government operations undermined, Halifax relied on a “skeleton-crew government”. Town Accountant Sandra Nolan stepped in as acting top official, despite having “no interest” in the Town Administrator role, simply because she felt it was “in the best interest of the town”. Police staffing was at a “difficult level”, and though candidates were identified Selig opted not to swear them in solo. The remaining town government largely focused on “rubber-stamp items such as paying bills, filling payroll, and ‘making sure the lights stay on’”. Selig acknowledged the “tough times” but expressed pride in how town workers “leaned in” to help.
The crisis concluded with a special election on November 8, 2022, held concurrently with the state’s mid-term election, to fill the two vacant Select Board seats. John Bruno, a former selectman for 15 years and town moderator for nearly a decade, ran unopposed for one seat, and Naja Nessralla was elected to the other, bringing the Select Board back to a full three members for the first time in 76 days. The new board’s “priority #1” was to find a new town administrator. A search committee, including the Town Accountant, Town Clerk, Police and Fire Chiefs, and three citizens-at-large, was formed to screen candidates.
Fast forward to 2025, and Halifax faces a different scenario. Town Administrator Cody Haddad’s resignation is a personal decision as he returns to Dartmouth. This departure is being managed with a clear transition plan, with Haddad giving ample notice and committing to assist during the transition. Select Board members have universally praised Haddad’s two-and-a-half-year tenure, crediting him with bringing “stability” to the town and charting a new course. Selectman Jonathan Selig noted that under Haddad’s leadership, the town shifted from, “putting out fires in the now to thinking down the road”. Board member Thomas Pratt stated he “always felt prepared” and “never surprised” with Haddad at the helm, calling him a “shining star”. Haddad himself noted a positive shift in town culture, experiencing “tremendous” support from residents, contrasting with the “vocal minority”.
The transition is marked by continuity, not chaos. Robert Fennessy, a former Town Administrator in Carver and Kingston with over 40 years of municipal and law enforcement experience, has been appointed as Interim Town Administrator. Fennessy was expected to get “up to speed within a week” and has expressed his intent to support the board and staff without disrupting ongoing operations. He is interested only in the interim position, not the permanent role. The board aims for an overlap between administrators to ensure a smooth handover.
The search for Halifax’s next permanent Town Administrator has already begun, with Haddad initiating contact with search firms for proposals. A new search committee has been formed, composed of citizens, a Finance Committee member, and the Town Clerk. The goal is to have a candidate in place by mid-August.
While the immediate leadership transitions are vastly different, it’s worth noting that Halifax continues to grapple with underlying community issues. For example, the ongoing dispute with Morse Brothers, Inc. over the cranberry bog project and alleged illegal sand mining activities, which was a flashpoint in 2022, resurfaced in 2024 with the Select Board issuing a cease-and-desist order and a $30,000 fine for multiple violations of the town’s Soil Removal By-law. Residents continue to express concerns about truck traffic, road damage, and water quality issues related to the operations. Additionally, the town is still dealing with challenges related to the MBTA Communities Act and discussions about a potential override for the fiscal year 2027 budget due to rising costs. These issues highlight that while the town’s governance has achieved stability, many challenges remain.
The contrast between these two periods highlights Halifax’s journey through challenging times to a more stable and collaborative environment. As the town embarks on finding its next permanent Town Administrator, the experience of 2022 serves as a stark reminder of past difficulties, while the current orderly transition reflects a significant improvement in town governance and community relations. The Board of Selectmen even named Selig chair, succeeding Bruno. This time he chairs the meetings with other members alongside him.
Kingston BOS approves ‘hybrid hiring’
During their July 15 meeting, the Kingston Board of Selectmen unanimously approved adopting a Massachusetts Civil Service Hybrid Model that allows the police department to hire officers through lateral transfers while maintaining traditional civil service requirements.
The Local Register Hiring Program, authorized under Massachusetts General Law Chapter 31, provides an additional hiring option for the police department without abandoning the existing civil service system. Lieutenant John Bateman of the Kingston Police Department explained that the program addresses ongoing hiring challenges across the commonwealth.
“It’s a good option for the town,” Bateman said. “There’s issues with hiring all throughout the commonwealth, and to be able to retain people, sometimes it’s fiscally responsible to be able to take someone as, per se, a lateral, take them on and hire them from a non-civil service town.”
The hybrid model requires that no more than 50% of officers can be hired outside the traditional civil service process after five years. Town Administrator Keith Hickey emphasized this provides flexibility while maintaining standards.
“It allows for us to attract, potentially recruit and hire a sworn officer for a lateral transfer, where right now we may not be able to, or may not be able to as easily,” Hickey said. “So it just makes life a little bit easier for the police department to keep their sworn officer fully staffed.”
The board also authorized the Police Chief and Town Administrator to engage in impact bargaining with affected labor units regarding the new hiring program.
In other personnel matters, the board appointed Krystal Rich as Assistant Town Treasurer with an anticipated start date of July 28. The appointment followed a competitive interview process conducted by Town Treasurer Ken Moalli.
Board member Carl Pike had requested to see the candidate’s resume, stating he wanted assurance about qualifications when asked to approve hiring decisions, but questioned whether it was necessary to involve the board in all hiring.
“I believe that the Board of Selectmen should be involved when you’re hiring department managers or directors, whatever we call them, but that the human resources group, the department heads, the town administrator should have authority to hire some of these lower positions without coming before the Board of Selectmen,” Pike said.
The board approved a temporary road closure request from Christopher Kastanek for Foxworth Lane on Saturday, Aug. 30, from 9 a.m. to 10 p.m. The closure includes conditions requiring emergency vehicle access, proper barricade placement, and neighborhood notification.
Multiple one-day liquor licenses received approval for Forty Second Brew Co. events, including a Gears and Beers event at Jones River Storage on July 26 and South Coast Cruisers events at Kingston Collection on July 19, 26, and Aug. 2.
The board also approved an amendment to a pilot agreement with Kearsarge Kingston LLC for solar panels on the town landfill. The modification clarifies language regarding land ownership, as Kingston owns the property being leased to the solar company. Hickey confirmed the amendment is revenue neutral.
Four individuals received appointments as special police officers through Dec. 31, 2025: Scott Peterson, Edward McDonald, Kaitlyn Mori, and David Hurley. These positions allow officers to work details and provide additional coverage when needed.
The board approved end-of-year line item transfers totaling approximately $250,000 after Finance Committee review. Pike noted the transfers represent less than 1% of the annual budget excluding education costs.
“Anybody that thinks they can budget within 1% on an annual basis, I’d like to hire them,” Pike said. “So I think it’s a good job.”
A special town meeting timeline received approval for Tuesday, Oct. 28, 2025. The timing aligns with Massachusetts School Building Association requirements for the school roof project.
During his administrator’s report, Hickey announced several upcoming initiatives. The Kingston School Committee plans to request creation of a school zone on Second Brook Street in front of Elementary and Intermediate Schools, with full police department support.
Street, Trees, and Parks will repave sidewalks on Main Street from Elm Street to Summer Street using Chapter 90 funds. The temporary repairs will address tree root damage and safety concerns.
“We’ve had a couple of people trip and fall, and we want to address that before it comes to liability,” Hickey said.
Hickey also reported initial discussions with Veterans Agent Sara Lansing and the Duxbury Town Manager about forming a Veterans district between the two communities. However, he expressed concerns about increased costs, as guidelines would require adding a full-time administrative position to support the Veterans Agent.
The regionalization study committee continues meeting with UMass Boston’s Collins Center to examine potential school regionalization with Plympton and Halifax, regionalizing Silver Lake through all grade levels.
“The Collins Center estimates it’ll take about 18 months, so we won’t see anything at next spring’s town meeting,” Hickey explained. He stressed that the study will stick to the facts. “It’ll be objective, giving people the information they need to make their own decisions,” Hickey said.
The study will look at population trends, financial forecasts, and get input from staff, teachers, and administrators across the school districts involved. Selectman Melissa Bateman highlighted the importance of including school employees in the study group.
The Collins Center plans to kick off the study with public meetings in each town to gather community input. They’ll likely present their final recommendations to all participating towns together.
Hickey pointed out that the study could have extra benefits beyond just looking at regionalization. “It might give us useful insights into budgeting and staffing for all three schools going forward,” he said.
Board members discussed scheduling collaborative budget meetings with finance committees and school committees from both Kingston and Silver Lake regional schools for fiscal year 2027 planning. These discussions aim to create unified budget presentations for next spring’s town meeting.
The board concluded the public session before entering executive session for non-union contract discussion.
LaNatra, Police Chief sound alarm
State Representative Kathleen LaNatra and Kingston Police Chief Brian Holmes are raising urgent concerns about the growing availability and use of kratom by minors in the region. Kratom, a substance derived from a Southeast Asian tree, is being sold openly in gas stations, smoke shops, and convenience stores – with no age restrictions – and is increasingly ending up in the hands of teenagers.
“Too many parents have never even heard of kratom, and yet their kids can walk into a local store and buy it right off the shelf,” said Representative LaNatra. “We’ve seen firsthand how this substance is being marketed as a harmless herbal supplement when in reality it can lead to addiction, psychosis, and even fatal overdoses.”
Kratom is not regulated by the FDA and poses unique risks to adolescents, whose brains are still developing. It acts on the same receptors as opioids and can have sedative or stimulant effects depending on the dose. Regular use has been linked to dependence, withdrawal symptoms, liver toxicity, and seizures. In high doses or when mixed with other substances, kratom can cause respiratory depression, coma, or death.
Chief Holmes echoed the concern: “We’ve encountered young people in our community who are using kratom, unaware of how dangerous it really is. It’s flying under the radar, and that’s a serious problem. There are no safeguards in place – no age restrictions, no proper labeling, no public awareness. Regulating this substance should be a strong consideration towards community safety through legislative priority.”
Kratom is often sold in capsules, powders, or liquid shots and marketed as a “natural” solution for energy or focus, a message that resonates with vulnerable teens. Social media influencers and online content have further fueled its popularity among youth.
“This is a community health and safety issue,” said LaNatra. “We need to act before more kids get hurt.”
For more information on kratom and how to protect young people from its dangers, visit the Mayo Clinic’s guidance on the topic or contact the Kingston Police Department for local resources.
Halifax appoints Fennessy interim TA
The Halifax Board of Selectmen unanimously appointed Robert Fennessy as Interim Town Administrator July 1, selecting him from two candidates interviewed for the temporary position.
Fennessy, who most recently served as town administrator in Carver, brings more than 40 years of experience in municipal government, law enforcement, and legal practice to Halifax. His appointment is subject to successful contract negotiations and background checks.
“I have a ton of background in management,” Fennessy told the board during his interview. “I have kind of a collaborative management style. I make people feel respected and appreciated for what they do.”
The board conducted interviews with Fennessy and Ari Sky, a former Lakeville Town Administrator with extensive financial management experience. Both candidates emphasized their commitment to maintaining stability during the transition period while the town searches for a permanent administrator.
Fennessy’s career spans law enforcement, municipal administration, and legal practice. He began as a police officer with the MSPCA law enforcement division, working his way up to Deputy Chief before attending law school and establishing a private practice. He later became a professor at UMass Law School, teaching municipal law, animal law, and employment law.
His municipal experience includes serving as town administrator in Boylston, Kingston, and most recently Carver, where he worked as an Interim Administrator before accepting the permanent position. He also served six terms as a Selectman in Plainville.
“I look at managing, not managing people, but bringing them on board so they feel respected,” Fennessy explained. “Whether you work for a highway or, you know, being a custodian or a department head or a committee member, a board member, or even a volunteer. I mean, you’ve got to bring them to you and bring them into the fold, or else they’re going to be bucking you all the way.”
Board Chair Jonathan Selig noted that both candidates were strong choices with different strengths. Board member Thomas Pratt highlighted Fennessy’s varied background, including his police experience, legal training, and HR knowledge.
“I thought they were both strong with different strengths,” Pratt said during the board’s deliberation. “I think Bob was quite strong in his background in the police, police background, the legal background, the HR background, a lot of different hats.”
Fennessy emphasized his approach to interim positions differs from permanent roles. He focuses on supporting existing staff and maintaining operations rather than implementing major changes.
“I look at being an interim a lot differently than I look at being a permanent,” he said. “Interim, I want to make sure they know that I’m here to support the board and support the staff and make sure that they know that, that they can count on me to take care of things that come to my attention.”
The new interim administrator plans to begin by meeting with all department heads individually and conducting group meetings to understand current operations and needs. He stressed the importance of maintaining communication and ensuring no surprises for the board.
“The first thing I would do is get a lay of the land, you know, meet the staff here,” Fennessy said. “And a short time later I’d make sure we had a department head meeting to go through what is going on as a group.”
Fennessy stressed that he has experience with Massachusetts municipal law, open meeting law, and public records requirements.
“Having a legal mind that I have, I can read something and instantly meander through it and know what we have to do,” he said. “You’re not having a Town Administrator who has to call legal counsel all the time.”
The interim administrator expressed familiarity with the Halifax area, having worked with several MSPCA officers who lived in town during his law enforcement career. He and his wife recently visited Halifax to familiarize themselves with the community.
Fennessy indicated his availability extends through the duration of the search process, with one planned vacation to the Greek Islands in September. He proposed working 28 to 38 hours per week across four days, taking advantage of the town’s Friday closure.
Current Town Administrator Cody Haddad, whose last day is July 8, praised the positive changes in town culture over the past two and a half years and offered to assist with the transition.
“If you look at where the town was two and a half years ago to where it is now, it’s not close to the same period,” Haddad said. “The culture has totally changed. All positive.”
The board plans to enter executive session to discuss contract negotiations with Fennessy. Board members expressed confidence in both candidates but ultimately felt Fennessy’s well-rounded experience and familiarity with the region made him the best fit for the interim role.
Selig noted the stark improvement in candidate quality compared to the town’s previous administrator search three years ago, calling it “a breath of fresh air” and crediting Halifax’s improved reputation for attracting quality candidates.
The appointment comes as Halifax faces various municipal challenges, including potential budget pressures and ongoing development issues. Fennessy’s experience with budget processes and municipal operations positions him to help guide the town through the transition period while maintaining stability for residents and staff.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- …
- 50
- Next Page »